|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- Favorable interest rates and desire to maintain strong cash position
led to decision to issue bonds.
Strong cash position is desirable to:
- Fund planned capital projects (see pages 38 & 39)
- Retain financial flexibility
- Prepare for emergencies
- Debt assumed in 2001
- Annual payments approximately $7.6 million
- Debt obligation until 2011
- $38.3M Outstanding as of September 30, 2005
- Bonds have been downgraded to BBB/Baa2 with Stable Outlook by Moody’s
and S&P
- No further debt anticipated
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
- Aviation finances have been a concern
- Fee and rate changes
- Increased lease rates in 2001 and 2003
- Increased parking rates in 2003
- Increased fuel flow fees in 2003
- In the spring of 2005, indicated to the major carrier that a landing
fee increase would be required in the near future
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Rental payments received from tenants for leased property and
improvements
- Includes improved, unimproved ground rent and improvements
- Major source of revenue given facilities that have been built over the
years
- Majority of leases contain escalation provisions
- Rates are reviewed each year as part of budget
- Adjustments recommended to cover operating costs or meet capital needs
- Adjusting rates have mid (3-5 years)
and long term impact
|
|
12
|
- Generate revenue to cover operating costs and capital needs – now and in
the future
- Ensure airport maintains self-sufficiency pursuant to DOT/FAA grant
assurances
- Provide opportunity, through competitive rental rates, for private
development and/or redevelopment of airport facilities
- Create/Generate economic development opportunity
- Create job opportunities
- Broaden the City’s tax base
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
- Established New Prevailing Rate March 2003
- Staff recommended establishing new prevailing ground annual rent rates
at Dallas Love Field
- Improved Ground (per sf) $ .26 $ .46
- Unimproved Ground (per sf) $ .20 $ .32
- New rate is at the mid-point of other comparable airports
- Most leases adjusted to prevailing rental rates every three years not
to exceed 12%
|
|
15
|
- Parking revenue consists of fees collected for utilization of Love Field
parking garages
- Rates are established by ordinance
- Dallas Love Field rates
- $10.00 per day Garage A
- $7.00 per day Garage B
- Rates were last adjusted in April 2003 from $7 to $10 for Garage A, and
from $5 to $7 for Garage B
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Contracts obligating businesses to pay to operate a business on property
including food and beverage services, retail stores, advertising, car
rental agencies, etc.
- Concession contracts awarded through competitive process
- Pay either a percentage of their monthly gross revenues or a guaranteed
minimum payment
- Adjusting rates through new contracts has a 3-5 year impact
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
- Fees paid by commercial aircraft owners to conduct operations at Dallas
Love Field
- Base rate is $.55 per 1,000 pounds.
- Rates were amended in 1987 to encourage commercial airlines to use their
quieter Stage III Aircraft at Love Field for $.35 per 1,000 pounds
- Current rate is $.35 per 1,000
pounds of landing
- weight for Stage III
aircraft (now federally mandated)
- Adjusting rates would have
immediate impact on
- revenues
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
- Generated through General Aviation activity only
- Fees collected from operators selling aircraft fuel at airports
- $.07 cents per gallon, increased from $.04 in April 2003
- Adjusting rates have immediate impact
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
- Return To Single $.55 per 1,000 Pound Landing Fee
- $.35 Stage III incentive no longer applicable
- Allows for a slightly better than "break even" annual
financial projection
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
- Brief Council on Wright Amendment January 18, 2006 (background and
history)
- Council Action on Landing Fees February 22, 2006 (to be Effective April
1, 2006)
- Review Rates and Charges to consider additional changes to be
recommended with the FY2007 Budget
|
|
30
|
- Aviation Department Cash Balances (p. 30)
- City Auditor’s Report on Lease Practices (p. 31)
- Report of Real Estate Task Force (p. 33)
- City Auditor’s Report on 9-1-1 Emergency Service Fee (p. 34)
- Funding Options For Improved Transit (p. 35)
- Capital Improvement Plan (p. 38)
- Enplanements (p. 40)
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
- City Audit on “Aviation Lease and Rental Agreements” released January
14, 2005
- Overall Conclusion:
- “… staff adequately ensured that lease/rental payments were in
accordance with contract provisions, that rental payments were paid on
a timely basis, and that the
rental revenues are properly accounted for and recorded”
|
|
33
|
- Opportunities for Improvements
- Length of month-to-month leases
- Council review of month to month leases
- Council committee briefed March 7, 2005
- Standardize lease form
- Accounting of all leasehold improvements
- Rental rates should be set to sustain airport
- Staff sets rates to sustain the airport
- Agreed to annual review of rates and charges
|
|
34
|
- Task Force reviewed leasing procedures of the department
- Council briefing included as an attachment
- Council briefed on March 2, 2005
- General findings
- “The committee was generally impressed with the polices and procedures
related to the Aviation Department”
- A high quality standard lease form is currently being used
- “… it seems that the existing airports are in a good consolidated
economic position”
- Recommendations
- Recommended several technical changes to standard lease form
- Established material lease provisions
- Annual review of month-to-month leases
- Annual review of rental rates
|
|
35
|
- City Audit on released May 13, 2005
- Review covered sources, uses and restriction of fees in the
administration of 9-1-1 services.
- Recent media report highlighted loan of $2.3 from Aviation Construction
Fund
- Did not adhere to policy related to transfer of funds
- Staff Response:
- Met the requirement of AD 4-5
- Loan was not an expenditure of funds
- Loan was fully documented between departments
- Loan was recommended to the City Council in a briefing prior to it
execution
- Payment identified in FY 2004-05 Budget document
- Funds are being repaid with interest
- Staff agrees to bring to Council
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
- Issues regarding transit access to Love Field
- Mode and Alignment
- Cost Benefit
- Cost sharing
- Ease of Access
|
|
38
|
- Funding options
- “Pay As You go” Approach
- Bond Financing
- Passenger Facility Charge
- Construct Station
- Pledge for financing
- Present funding plan once mode of transit and alignment is determined
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
|